comment added
Replying to ross@soi.city.ac.uk: Are you referring to the package list or the page for an individual package? To the page for the individual package.
View Articlecomment added
Replying to nominolo: Ok, then how about a two-column layout? The text goes on the left and the meta information on the right. This way all the important information would stay on top, and authors are...
View Articlecomment added
I see Don wanted users to be able to add the links to a package after upload. They'd probably want to add text too, so what's required is essentially a wiki page for each package, though I'm not sure...
View Articlecomment added
Ok, then how about a two-column layout? The text goes on the left and the meta information on the right. This way all the important information would stay on top, and authors are free to add more...
View Articlecomment added
The package list uses the Synopsis field (plain text), rather than Description (haddock markup).
View Articlecomment added
Hm, maybe we should split the description field into short-description and long-description or similar. Or, like in Emacs introduce the convention that the first 80 characters or the first sentence...
View Articlecomment added
The project description is haddock markup so adding links is already possible. Perhaps that'd be enough if it was well known.
View Article
